Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is place in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Unfortunately, that was not genuine. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son advised his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to acquiring sexually molested the few’s son several times.
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your reduced courts.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it can be actually fairly imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the 90-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name within the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. In the event the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
10. Based over the findings on the inquiry committee, this petition isn't viewed check here as maintainable and is therefore liable for being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases From the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.